Haiti Earthquake- Long Term Management

Building resilience and Future capacity

Some people have had to spend 3 years in their camps. They had:

  • No money to build

NGOs helped the local people by:

  • Improving financial support for rebuilding
  • Improving infrastructure
  • Training stonemasons to make future settlements stronger
  • Building new settlements on outskirts

The relocated people would have had to still pay rent for housing had the refugee camps not been set up; the camps helped provide shelter for those who would not have been able to afford this in their current financial situation.

In the refugee camps, people had to travel to work. Often the fees of transport were so expensive that people could spend more money travelling to and fro between work and the camps than they would earn. So, many people had taken to just sleeping rough outside their offices during the week and only coming home at weekends.

There were toilets in the camps so there was one between every five families. One of the main aims of the new buildings was to remove this issue.

  • Have to travel to work
  • Spaced out buildings
  • No heavy tiles
  • Use local technology so homes can be fixed by local people.
  • Buildings were built with plenty of open spaces, so people can get away from falling buildings more quickly.
  • Buildings have only a few storeys, so there’s less to collapse in during future quakes, and also have timber frames, which are more flexible, so less likely to collapse in a future earthquake.
  • Lightweight structures, and only using light weight tiles means that if anything collapses in the future, it will be less damaging to anybody around.

 

 

Creditors died with the earthquake

  • Businesses have to be reset up again
  • Oxfam helped with this:
  • Financial security to support many businesses
  • Monthly allowances

Most food was imported.

Oxfam was trialing different techniques in Haiti to get good crop growth. Oxfam funded small rice mills to get a better price at the market for farmers. Unprocessed rice is worth far less, so by allowing the rice mills to be more available, farmers can get more profits, allowing rural areas to support themselves better in the aftermath. With more rice mills, it is overall cheaper to use them.

Profits from mills help pay for drainage channels which increase yield again. This is an overall positive multiplier effect.

Land reform is a necessary feature of the rebuilding. Before the earthquake, unclear laws on land ownership meant that when the earthquake hit, camps had to be built in poor sites as the owners could not be tracked down and asked permission to use any land closer to the capital. Most of the land is only claimed by a few people, and overall this makes it hard to make long term investments. Companies and investors want a guaranteed pay out, which they can’t get from the unclear laws as it was.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s